This is a bit of a vanity post, so excuse me blowing my own trumpet.
I just took a look at the speaker evaluation feedback from UKOUG 2012 and it was pretty good. Only 4 of the people left “wordy” feedback:
- Could have done with more time. Just the sort of presentation I came to conference for v.good.
- Impressive.
- Brilliant presenter and useful content, could have been twice as long.
- Very nice presentation.
As far as the rating feedback went, the scores in each area were out of 6. I got just under 5 for the slides and the rest (content, presentation skills and value of presentation) were all above 5, which I think is pretty good. I was particularly happy with the presentation skills result.
I don’t take this stuff too seriously as these ratings are very subjective. Some people are always mega-critical and some people would give you 6/6 if you tripped and fell of the stage, but it is a nice little ego boost.
Cheers
Tim…
PS. It kinda makes up for the terrible job I did last year, so I guess my average rating for UKOUG presentations is now about “meh’… 🙂
